Skip to main content

Sabean's Conundrum as the Trade Deadline Approaches

Jeff Samardzija and Jason Hammel are both now Oakland Athletics.  I guess it's better than them both being Dodgers or Cardinals or any other competitor of the Giants for a playoff spot.  However, it does basically price out David Price (a pun!) from the Giants shopping cart. Did you see the names that went to the Cubbies for Samardzija and Hammel?  Legitimate, top tier prospects.  The Rays, if they even choose to move Price, will look for a similar package.  Do you know what top tier prospects the Giants have to offer?  None.  Zilch.  Zero.

Hence the problem with our Gigantes and the trade deadline at the end of the month.

Last season the Giants prospect cupboard was a quasi barren wasteland.  All our "real" talent was in the low minors we were told.  It was relatively accurate.  Kyle Crick, our top prospect, was in Single-A ball.  So was Clayton Blackburn.  And Ty Blach.  Edwin Escobar was making a name for himself first in Single-A and then later Double-A.  Joe Panik was in Double-A and no one really knew who Adam Duvall was yet.  No, the names that were close to MLB "ready" were Chris Heston and Mike Kickham.  Sort of Heath Hembree.  And kind of Nick Noonan.  Oh and a mid-twenties Roger Kieschnick.  Giants fans will remember these guys because most of them got promoted to our lousy baseball team in 2013 and, aside from Hembree, were god awful.   Brian Sabean did something he rarely has ever done that season - he sat on his hands and did not make a trade.  He didn't trade away his veterans to gain prospects and he didn't trade his prospects to gain a veteran.  He stayed the course.

And why did he stay the course?  Because it was evident the Giants were not really contenders last year and he didn't see a fix out there that could get the team on track.  He also didn't see enough value from other teams for any of our veterans.  So he kept everyone, prospects and veterans alike.  I assume his thought process was that in 2014, our "better" minor league prospects would have more value and that he could retool the 2014 squad and shape them into a contender.

Well, he was half right.  He DID retool the 2014 squad and make them contenders.  Despite a June that would have made the 2008 Giants cringe, the Giants ended the first weekend of July only a half game behind the Dodgers for first place.  Sure, they were UP 9.5 games on LA at one point, but the only standings that matter are the ones at the end of the regular season.  The Giants survived what we can only hope was their worst stretch of the season and they have finally been showing signs of coming out of it.  Sabean was right on that front; he could retool the disappointing 2013 team and make them contenders in 2014 but he was wrong about our prospects.  At least, at the moment, he appears to be wrong. Why? Because at this time our top 20 prospects are all doing miserably in the minors.  That's not an exaggeration.  I think Andrew Susac is the only Giants top prospect that can say he's having a solid season.  Everyone else?  Ugh.  Yuck.  Edwin Escobar is getting soul crushed at AAA.  Derek Law and Mac Williamson are out for the year recovering from Tommy John.  Adalberto Mejia?  Chris Stratton?  Joan Gregorio?  Martin Agosta?  They all have ERA's over 5.   The Giants continue to think Juan Perez is a better use of a roster spot on the 25-man than Gary Brown which tells you all you need to know about Gary Brown.  Joe Panik is the only prospect that has made good (so far) by coming up and actually providing usefulness.  Heath Hembree hasn't been throwing well and has a bad WHIP.  Kyle Crick, our consensus #1 prospect, has a nice ERA (3.22) but has been allowing all sorts of baserunners (a 1.50 WHIP).

The Giants prospects theoretically have LOST value instead of gaining some with more experience. While it's true that scouts and ballclubs don't just look at stats when it comes to evaluating young players, stats DO play a part.  Now, the good news for the Giants is that sometimes other squads covet players for different reasons.  In 2012 the Giants got Marco Scutaro for Charlie Culberson.  You can't tell me with a straight face that the Giants ever thought Culberson was actually an MLB starting infielder.  To trade Culberson, who is likely at his highest ceiling an okay utility guy, for an established veteran second baseman is highway robbery.  And it paid off handsomely for the Giants that year.  In 2010, the Giants got Cody Ross for NOTHING because the Marlins just wanted his salary to go away.

So the Giants are not screwed.  But as the A's just showed, you get splashier names when you have splashier prospects.  The Giants do NOT have splashy prospects so it's safe to say the David Price's of the world are not coming to SF.  But the Giants don't necessarily need an impact trade to improve.  As they begin clawing their way out of the wretched baseball they had been playing, their needs continually shift.  For awhile, it looked like Sabean would need to get a starting pitcher because Lincecum looked lost, Vogelsong was hot and cold, and Cain forgot he once was a really good pitcher. Now the rotation has stabilized.  Bumgarner is an All-Star, Hudson might be one as well, Lincecum has given up 1 run in his past 3 starts COMBINED, and Cain made a mechanical tweak and looks better, though not fixed quite yet.  Vogelsong has pitched better as well.  Would the Giants do well to get another "ace" pitcher?  Sure, what team wouldn't?  But the only ace pitcher out there now is David Price and it's not even a given he'll get traded since Tampa Bay is making a run up the standings.  Any other pitcher available is not going to be a big upgrade over what the Giants currently have in their rotation.  So if there isn't a clear upgrade, why make a trade that would require the Giants to essentially empty their farm system?  Well, there are other areas where the Giants need help...

Second base is the obvious one.  Can the Giants entrust second to Joe Panik for the rest of the year? Panik has looked better as he's settled into life as a major leaguer but the Giants would be taking a big gamble that he'll continue to look good the rest of the year because second base is by far the easiest position to identify as a weakness.  Even if Scutaro comes back in a platoon role, there is a lot of "ifs" going on there.

With Romo's meltdown, the bullpen could use stabilizing as well.  Not only has Romo unraveled but Jean Machi has become hittable.  The Giants bullpen was a strength in April and May.  They looked mediocre in June.  The Giants are using Santiago Casilla as their closer at the moment and he does have the stuff to be a full time closer.  But Sabean loves making his bullpens better at the deadline and if he makes ANY move, it likely will be for additional set up men or an actual proven closer.

The bench has been pretty bad all season long.  Sabean and Bochy are big fans of veterans.  It would make sense if they looked into some additional bench options that could potentially displace Brandon Hicks,  Joaquin Arias, Juan Perez, and Ehire Adrianza on the roster.  Tyler Colvin, Hector Sanchez, and Gregor Blanco appear safe at this point but it's not like they're setting the world on fire either.  The whole bench could use some tweaking but it's realistic Sabean is looking for another outfielder especially with Pagan being such a question mark.

Lastly, the rotation.  Sabean could be looking at starting pitching just because the old adage is that you can never have enough starting pitching.  But the truth is that starting pitching is usually hard to acquire and we've already covered why the Giants can't really put together a package to acquire an upgrade. So while Sabean is no doubt kicking the tires on some starting pitchers, his needs are more acute elsewhere.

If the Giants could make just one deal, what do you think is the most pressing need?  The bench, the bullpen, the rotation, or the line-up?

My guess is Sabean will acquire a tried and true closer.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The MLB Deadline 2023: What will the Giants do?

The MLB Trade Deadline is a week away. The Giants started off the 2nd half hot, going 5-0 sweeping the Pittsburgh Pirates and then taking the first two games against a sneaky good Reds team in Cincinnati. Since then? A complete dumpster fire. The Giants have lost 6 in a row, finishing a 11-game road trip against mostly sub .500 teams at 5-6. Although the road trip was long and somewhat grueling, the opponents represented a soft spot in the schedule for SF, a chance to make up ground on the Los Angeles Dodgers who had a brutal portion of their schedule on the road against contenders like the Baltimore Orioles and Texas Rangers. The Dodgers went 6-3 to instead put distance between themselves and the Giants and Dbacks. The Giants are broken. They have been one of the most injured teams in baseball which has led to extensive playing time for rookies who are showing they're not quite ready for a pennant race. After a scorching 18-8 June, the Giants are currently 8-11 in July. They are s

What is the plan for the San Francisco Giants?

Ohtani is gone. Yamamoto is gone. Worse, they're both Dodgers for the next decade. If you missed my tongue in cheek Christmas poem about it, you can take a minute to read it here . The thing that sucks most about the two best free agents joining the Dodgers is that they chose the easy path, both joining a juggernaut that didn't necessarily need them. Instead of making baseball interesting, had even one just signed with LA and the other signing with someone else, it would have built up some fun storylines. Yamamoto and Juan Soto on the Yankees? Ohtani on the Dodgers? Potentially great theater in a World Series, much like watching Ohtani the pitcher face Trout in the WBC this past year. Or Ohtani the Dodgers hitter facing Yamamoto the Giants pitcher in one of baseball's best rivalries? It could have been a great addition to the rivalry for the foreseeable future. Instead? Yamamoto and Ohtani will team up to make baseball's best team for the past decade even better. Bah hu

Introduction to SF Giants Guy

Well, hello fellow Giants fans. Let me introduce myself. My "internet" name is Macster but here on this blog, you can call me SF Giants Guy. I am a die hard San Francisco Giants fan. And I have taken issue with the fact that the Giants haven't brought the bling to San Francisco in my 30 years of living. I'm sure many of you who will stumble upon this blog will take issue with the fact the Giants have never won a championship as members of the San Francisco Bay Area period. I feel your pain. This blog is to vent, scrutinize, rumor-monger, and figure out ways we're better than Brian Sabean and Bruce Bochy and how we can fix our damn local 9. I will update the blog on a weekly basis (or on off-days) with my thoughts on the team. I'll include fascinating rumors about the Gigantes as well as give my ideas on improving them. Feel free to comment, to agree, to disagree, to throw out your own ideas. My hope for this thing is that we create a nice little com